Even if it might not be true, evidence cannot be false

Abstract Wordly internalists claim that while internal duplicates always share the same evidence, our evidence includes non-trivial propositions about environment. It follows some is false. Worldly internalism thought to provide a more satisfying answer scepticism than classical internalist views deny these environment might belong and generally attractive account of rationality reasons for belief. We argue worldly faces serious difficulties its apparent advantages are illusory. First, it cannot adequately handle not terribly strange cases perceptual error. Second, explain why one should plan use their update beliefs. The second issue allows us misplaced certainty do require introduce false into alleged advantage in resisting sceptical pressures